The tea ceremony in Buenos Aires
I sit on a window table at La Farola de San Isidro and the waiter will bring me a cortado en jarrito with three facturas surtidas without being asked. Then I will read the newspaper (always back to front), pay and go back home to start working.
I would start every day that way if I could. It makes my day start great. I get to work relaxed. It puts a definite boundary between me being dad taking my son to school and me being at work, even if I am doing it at home.
Ritualization is comforting. Rituals are good for most people. On the other hand, rituals suck, are a waste of resources, and hurt you.
Sure, my coffee+newspaper is nice, but it would cost me $15 a day, which means over $5700 a year, which is more than half of what my son's school costs. So I ony do it once a week, and the rest of the time I just buy the same damn facturas and take the coffee at home, while reading the newspaper on my netbook (BTW: there's just no way to read newspapers back-to-front on the web).
What I did was realize I had fallen into a ritual, decide if it served a useful purpose, estimate the costs, and decide against it. That means I acted rationally, and the choice I made seems correct to me. The best part of doing that is not even saving money, but knowing that I am paying attention.
I was reading yesterday a newspaper I shouldn't read [1] and ran into a fluff piece about teaching tea protocol to kids about girls, ages 6 to 13, at a party in the Alvear hotel.
It's meaningless nonsense, but it's the kind of nonsense that can piss me off. Here are some choice quotes, translated:
"A girl asked for sugar, even though the right thing is not to sweeten the tea."
"When it's time to put jam on your scone or toast, you should never cover it. 'Smear jam only on the piece you are eating, and never from the jar, always put some in the plate, then from the plate to the toast"
"... the belly of the fork should be at the bottom if you finished eating cake, or at the top if you ate a piece of meat."
"Even if it may seem a novelty, protocol for children has 500 years of history. A precursor was the dutch humanist Erasmus of Rotterdam who in 1530 published a treaty on civility aimed to all children, specially those of the court, where he presented a common code of behaviour..."
Where can I start... how about this is all made up nonsense? The belly of the fork aiming down or up? Put the jam in the plate first? Bitter tea for 6 year olds? Erasmus of freaking Rotterdam in 1530?
Here's what this is, it's ritual. It's meaningless ritual. We don't live in the dutch court in 1530, why should we feel it's "right" to act like they did? Why should we not act like 20th century moroccans and eat with our right hand instead?
At least moroccan food tastes good, unlike scones!
Of course I am not against things like using a napkin instead of sucking on your fingers (but hey, I am not going to call you names if you do it, and I will bloody do it if there's no napkins), but all these random rules without any explanation are the exact kind of things kids should not be exposed to.
Yes, sometimes you have to put your feet down and say "it's done this way and I can't explain it to you yet", but that's the exception not the rule.
Why should you use a napkin? Because if you don't your fingers are sticky and leave marks. Why your fork should stay on the plate after you use it? Because I don't want to wash the tablecloth today if I can help it. Why you should put the jam from the jar into the toast? Because I don't want leftover jam in the plate, thank you.
If you teach your kids that there are arbitrary rules without reasons, even in silly things like tea, you are forming the wrong thing in their brains, you are teaching them that authority is right, that habit is truth, that tradition is law.
And if you do it, allah forbid, then maybe they will do it too, and rituals ossify, and you get a country full of morons that have echo chambers instead of opinions.
The ritualization of everyday things is a sign of decadence in society. The more ritualistic the simple things get, the more those people are not thinking complex thought, the more they waste their mind in the trivial.
So make my day, leave the fork belly up after eating cake today. Even better: don't look and don't care.
El manual de Erasmo es buenísimo! Tenés que tener en cuenta que en el siglo XVI cuando él lo escribe, la mayor parte de las reglas de civilización que uno tiene interiorizadas (inconcientemente) no eran comunes. Por ejemplo, el texto dedica algunas páginas a explicarte por qué no tenés que cagar en frente de otra persona si estás teniendo una conversación, sino que tenés que irte a un lugar apartado a hacer tus necesidades. Durante la modernidad este tipo de reglas que comenzaron a aplicarse en la corte (vg. Versalles durante el siglo XVII), se fueron transmitiendo al resto de la sociedad y convirtiéndose en una forma de poder interiorizado. Es un proceso muy interesante que estudió el sociólogo Norbert Elias en "El proceso de la civilización".
Por otro lado, con respecto a lo que decís de los rituales, hay algo muy interesante que dicen Max Horkheimer y Theodor Adorno en "Dialéctica de la Ilustración" cuando hablan de los sacrificios: "La famosa irracionalidad del sacrificio no expresa sino que la práctica de los sacrificios ha sobrevivido a su necesidad racional, ya de por sí no verdadera, es decir, particular. Ésta es la brecha entre racionalidad e irracionalidad del sacrificio que la astucia utiliza como asidero. Toda demitologización tiene la forma de la continua experiencia de la inutilidad y superfluidad de los sacrificios".
Creo que es algo que puede aplicarse a todo ritual. Todos tienen inicialmente un momento de utilidad, donde vos elegís tomar café o leer el diario a la mañana para satisfacer determinada necesidad o lo que fuera. Pero en la medida en que el rito se perpetúa, puede haber un momento en que objetivo y rito, contenido y forma se disocien, entonces vos continuás con el rito más allá de que haya perdido utilidad. En el fondo de esto está el mecanismo por el cual una determinada práctica orientada a lograr la autoconservación se transforma en instrumento (dispositivo, dirá Foucault) de poder.
Perdón por la respuesta extranerd.
Buenísima la respuesta. Y nada en contra de Erasmus si él convencio a la gente de hacer caca en privado!
Esto es exactamente lo que pasa con la religión
Ja, y mirá que tuve cuidado de no decir nada religioso eh...
* el permalink de la versión en español me parece que está roto
* enervar no quiere decir lo que vos querés decir
* che, que los escones de mi vieja son ricos :)
* mires, no miers
* me encantó :)
* Sí, manda a la versión en inglés. Eso me pasa por tocar el template a las 2AM :-)
* Lo usé en el sentido de "me pone nervioso" que es el 3ro en el diccionario de la RAE: http://rae.es/enervar
* Y bueno, traéme dos y corrijo ;-)
* Y día en vez de di
* 'Chas gracias!
Corrigiendo lo fácil ahora, lo difícil dentro de un rato...
* el link que yo veo es a
http://lateral.netmanagers....
* me traicionaron! hasta hace poco solamente mencionaba lo de “tranquilizar”. A actualizarme, entonces.
* te consigo la receta
Ahhhh ahí está mal de otra manera distinta :-) Ya lo reviso.
Creeeeo que ahí lo corregí. El link en la fecha de publicación estaba mal hace 3 o 4 años por lo menos, desde que habilité la traducción!
Algunos apuntes casi al azar:
1. Me gustan los scones!
2. Si un desayuno te cuesta $15 considerá que es el costo de vivir en San Isidro.
3. No me fijé que ofrece Clarín (que siendo ya más-porteño-que-si-hubieras-nacido-en-Monserrat supongo que es lo que leés), La Capital de Rosario ofrece (pagando, creo) la "edición impresa" en PDF, que supongo se puede leer de atrás para adelante por más que sea en PC.
4. Fijate porque no se pueden postear comentarios desde Konqueror, el textarea queda inactivo.
1. Y bueno, yo lepongo mayonesa a la tortilla de papas, no soy parámetro :-)
2. Son $11.50 + $2.75 del diario +$1 de propina, son $15.25 ... el chiste es que esas 3 facturas son como media docena de otros lugares. Tengo que sacar una foto!
3. Comprado en kiosko leía Crítica, que lamentablemente ya no se puede. Ahora volví a página 12. Podría leer el clarín del bar, pero la mitad de las veces no hay libres.
4. No depende de mí, me temo, es un servicio tercerizado a disqus.com
I can't believe there's people eating scones (of all things!) in Buenos Aires (of all places!) while obsessing on some weird concept of "European Tea Ceremony" which doesn't really exist outside of England -- and even in England, it was mostly a XIX century invention to fight the commercial invasion of continental-style coffee-houses and it's almost disappeared (although it was recently revamped by big hotels trying to look a bit less empty in the afternoon).
Argentina must be a very interesting place :)
Oh, and I agree on the point of the post, btw. The only thing you don't mention is the effect these rituals have on social composition: people who can memorize a lot of useless and impractical stuff must have a lot of free time, i.e. they are probably "old money" rich or (more often, these days) desperately want to look like them. They are building walls rather than bridges, promoting themselves as elites on absolutely arbitrary basis. I'm sure they'll get their own special place in hell.
Indeed the whole point is exhibition of wealth, and not only in the leisure involved in wasting time learning arbitrary rules.
For example the reason for the cutlery language is so they wouldn't have to actually speak to servants (hey, the fork position means he's coming back, so let's not pick up his plate yet). And that's so they could act as if the servants are not even there.
Oh, and yes, it's an interesting place, if you ever drop by I'll buy you a cup of coffee ;-)
You could say that this sort of rituals are a way of creating a class identity. They are part of the simbols, ideas and experiences that define the social construction of a class consciousness. These rules are meant to be applied in specific sociability spaces which are associated with a specific group of people. Is not so much about having the time to memorize this rules (because we all memorize stupid things), but about participating in these spaces which define people as members of a certain group. And they are, of course, tainted with the ideology of such a class which includes, for example, the despice for servitude as Roberto described.